Bradshaw Foundation - Latest News

BRADSHAW FOUNDATION - LATEST NEWS

 

Neolithic Gathering and Feasting at Gobekli Tepe

03 Aug 2017
Share on Facebook

An article by Jens Notroff & Oliver Dietrich on the American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) - Göbekli Tepe: Neolithic Gathering and Feasting at the Beginning of Food Production - reports on the ongoing research at Göbekli Tepe and the light it sheds on the emergence of agriculture and animal husbandry, and the onset of food production and the Neolithic way of life.

Neolithic Gathering and Feasting at Gobekli Tepe, archaeology, Turkey

The mound of Göbekli Tepe seen from the south. Image: K. Schmidt, DAI.

South-eastern Turkey - the tell of Göbekli Tepe, situated on the highest point of the otherwise barren Germuş mountain range. This man-made mound rises 15 metres in height and covers about 9 hectares. It is the earliest known monumental cult architecture in the ancient Near East. It was constructed by hunter-gatherers soon after the end of the last Ice Age. It was intentionally buried it about 10,000 years ago.

View into Enclosure D in the main excavation area. Image: N. Becker, DAI.

Göbekli Tepe has been known to archaeologists since the 1960's, when a joint survey team from the Universities of Istanbul and Chicago under the direction of Halet Çambel and Robert Braidwood observed numerous flint artefacts littering the surface of the mound. However, the monumental architecture remained undetected, and was eventually discovered by Klaus Schmidt on a grand tour of important south-eastern Turkish Neolithic sites in 1994. He noticed the large limestone blocks, reminding him of another nearby Neolithic site - Nevalı Çori - where he had worked several years before. Excavations at this site began the next year.

Neolithic Gathering and Feasting at Gobekli Tepe, archaeology, Turkey

Aerial view of Göbekli Tepe. Image: E. Kücük, DAI.

In about 22 years of ongoing fieldwork, the German Archaeological Institute and the Şanlıurfa Museum Museum have revealed a totally unexpected monumental architecture at Göbekli Tepe, dating to the earliest Neolithic period. No typical domestic structures have yet been found, leading to the interpretation of Göbekli Tepe as a ritual centre for gathering and feasting. The people creating these megalithic monuments were still highly mobile hunter-foragers and the site's material culture corroborates this: substantial amounts of bones exclusively from hunted wild animals, and a stone tool inventory comprising a wide range of projectile points. Osteological investigations and botanical studies show that animal husbandry was not practiced at Göbekli Tepe and domesticated plants were unknown.

 
Article continues below
 

Two colossal pillars - measuring about 5.5 m, on shallow pedestals carved out of the carefully smoothed bedrock. This central pair of pillars is surrounded by a circle formed of similar, but slightly smaller pillars which are connected by stone walls and benches. 

Neolithic Gathering and Feasting at Gobekli Tepe, archaeology, Turkey

Aerial view of the main excavation area of Göbekli Tepe. The older monumental enclosures shown in the lower center. Image: E. Kücük, DAI.

The surrounding pillars are decorated with depictions of animals such as foxes, aurochs, birds, snakes, and spiders. The central T-shaped pillars display a more anthropomorphic character: they clearly display arms depicted in relief on the pillars' shafts, with hands brought together above the abdomen, pointing to the middle of the waist. Belts and loincloths underline this impression and emphasize the human-like appearance of these pillars. 

While naturalistic and abstract depictions find their most monumental manifestation on the T-shaped pillars, there are others. Similar and clearly related iconography also occurs on functional objects like so-called shaft straighteners, on stone bowls and cups, as well as on small stone tablets which apparently do not have any other function than to bear these signs. 

 Neolithic Gathering and Feasting at Gobekli Tepe, archaeology, Turkey

Pillar 43 (left) in Enclosure D whose rich decoration clearly indicates an apparently narrative character of many of the reliefs. Image: K. Schmidt, DAI. Detail of Pillar 18 (right) showing hands, belt, and loincloth in relief. Image: N. Becker, DAI.

There are a few other sites with T-shaped pillars in the close vicinity; a spiritual concept seems to have linked these sites to each other, suggesting a larger cultic community among Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN - ca. 9,600-8,800 calBC) mobile groups in Upper Mesopotamia, tied in a network of communication and exchange.

Ethnologic and historic analogies emphasize the importance of regular gatherings and collective activities as means of maintaining social cohesion in hunter-gatherer communities. Gatherings also allowed for the exchange of information, goods, and marriage partners. 

Such large-scale gatherings naturally need to be established in locations that are known and easily accessible for the participating groups - the topographical situation of Göbekli Tepe as a landmark overlooking the surrounding plains seems a perfectly suitable central space for these groups and people inhabiting the wider region. 

Large communal tasks executed as collective work events, reflected in the apparently continuous construction activity at Göbekli Tepe, provided a unifying reason for people to come together; large workforces means lavish feasts. Evidence of flint artefacts, fragments of stone vessels, other ground stone tools, and in particular an impressively large numbers of animal bones - above all gazelle and aurochs - supports this.

Neolithic Gathering and Feasting at Gobekli Tepe, archaeology, Turkey

Map showing location of Göbekli Tepe. 3D-model of Pillar 18, one of the central pillars of Enclosure D, illustrating the anthropomorphic character of the T-shaped pillars with the depiction of arms, hands, a belt and loincloth. Image: HS Karlsruhe.

Repetitive feasting at Göbekli Tepe may have played an essential role not only in creating and strengthening social bonds among the individuals and groups meeting there, but must also have stressed the economic potential of these hunter-gatherers to repeatedly feed such large crowds. 

Consequently, new food resources and processing techniques may have been explored, subsequently paving the way for a complete change in subsistence strategy. This suggests that the early appearance of monumental religious architecture, and all that involves, led to the emergence of agriculture and animal husbandry, and the onset of food production and the Neolithic way of life.

Jens Notroff and Oliver Dietrich are research assistants in the Göbekli Tepe project of the German Archaeological Institute (DAI), excavations at Göbekli Tepe are carried out in close cooperation with the Şanlıurfa Haleplibahçe Museum. Archaeobiological research is conducted by the Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich. The project is funded by the DAI and the German Research Foundation (DFG). 

For more information on the research at the site:
https://tepetelegrams.wordpress.com/

Ritual use of skulls at Gobekli Tepe:

http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/news/archaeology.php?id=Ritual-use-of-skulls-at-Gobekli-Tepe 

COMMENTS

 
Bradshaw FoundationAboutiShopBook ReviewSite MapMailing ListDonateFacebookTwitterContact
If you have enjoyed visiting this section of the website please consider adding a link
Bradshaw Foundation © MMXI
Homepage About the Foundation Contact Us Facebook News Articles Twitter List of Research Papers Professor Stephen Oppenheimer Travel Index About the Expeditions Forthcoming Expeditions Bespoke Expeditions Enquire Practical Information History of Exploration Welcome to the iShop Film Downloads DVD's Sculpture Prints Clothing Messenger Bag eBooks INORA Downloads About iLecture Films Shipping & Handling iLectures In Conversation Video Stories Travel Films Read the reviews Join the free Mailing List Bradshaw Foundation Facebook Friends of the Foundation Archive Index World's Oldest Rock Art Africa Documentary Films South Africa RARI Giraffe Carvings Niger Namibia Western Central Africa Africa Paintings Gallery Tanzania The Tuareg People Tuareg Salt Caravans Gilf Kebir Birnin Kudu Rock Art Center Archive Index San Rock Art Paintings San Bushman San Rock Art Film Origins Centre Johannesburg Archive Index Arizona Baja California Baja California Film Coso Range Talking Stone Film Nevada Oregon Territory Moab, Utah Clovis First Australia Archive Index Introduction Bradshaw Paintings Kimberley Region The Unambal Hugh Brown Leif Thiele Gallery Dan Clark Grahame Walsh Ian Wilson Bradshaws / Gwion Gwion Archive Index Introduction Origins of the British Avebury Stonehenge Sounds of Stonehenge The British Museum British Isles Megaliths Gower Peninsula Rock Art Mendip Hills Prehistory Northumberland Rock Art Red Lady of Paviland Stone Age Mammoth Abattoir Archive Index Introduction Peterborough Petroglyphs Western Canadian Rock Art Writing-On-Stone Wuikinuxv Territory Dinosaur Provincial Park Archive Index Huashan Rock Art Yinchuan Museum Rock Art Festival Field Trip Gallery Itinerant Creeds Inner Mongolia & Ningxia Vanishing Civilization Life in Rock Art (PDF) Tibet Tibet Photographs Dazu Rock Carvings Tiger Motif Archive Index Chauvet Cave Lascaux Cave Niaux Cave Cosquer Cave Rouffignac Cave Portable Art Defining Rock Art Tuc d'Audoubert Bison Dr. Jean Clottes Index UNESCO World Heritage Introduction Cave Paintings Gallery Visiting the Chauvet Cave Return to Chauvet Cave Investigating the Cave Venus & Sorcerer Werner Herzog Film Chauvet Publications India Archive Index Rock Art Central India Pachmarhi Hills India Rock Art Gallery Preservation & Education Dr. V. S. Wakankar Articles on India Rock Art Contemporary Art Middle East Archive Index Middle East Inroduction Rock Art of Iran Rock Art of Saudi Arabia United Arab Emirates Rock Art Ancient Geometry Middle East Colonisation Scandinavian Rock Art Archive Scandinavian Introduction Alta Rock Art Norway Rock Art in Finland Tanum Rock Art Sweden Thor Heyerdahl Archive Index Introduction America's Oldest Art? Pedra Furada Bolivian Rock Art Campeche Island - Brazil Checta Petroglyphs - Peru Cueva de las Manos Santa Catarina Island - Brazil Rock Art in Britain Campeche Rock Art Petroglyphs El Salvador - Corinto Cave Hand Rock Art Paintings Tibetan Rock Art United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yinchuan Rock Art Museum Introduction Ice Age Art Gallery Claire Artemyz Jill Cook Interview Cycladic Introduction Cycladic Gallery Introduction Geometric Signs Chart Research Methodology Geometric Signs in France Sign Types/Countries/Regions Bibliography Ancient Symbols in Rock Art Newsletter Archive Download Issues Introduction Genetic Map Professor Stephen Oppenheimer Further Reading Origins of the British BBC Documentary Origins Index Origins Overview 13 Big Questions Stanley Ambrose Homo Floresiensis Herto Skulls Homo Dmanisi Liujiang Skull Introduction Sentinels in Stone Easter Island Rock Art Birdman Cult / Motif Sea & Marine Creatures Design & Motifs Dr Georgia Lee Easter Island Map Contemporary Art Glossary Conclusion Thor Heyerdahl Introduction When & Who Built It? How Was It Built? The Area Sounds of Stonehenge Meaning of a Pyramid Pyramid Studies Pyramid Superstructure Pyramid Substructure Pyramid Preparations Pyramid Building Saqqara Nabil Swelim Temples of Malta and Gozo Research in the Caucasus The Keselo Foundation Homo Dmanisi Ancient Toolmakers Index Introduction Descent into the Cave The Decorated Caves Shamanistic Experience Spring Initiation Rites Summary Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Professor John P. Miller Motif: Eternal Index Banksy Han Meilin Bruce Radke Christian Tuki Gordon Ellis-Brown Site Map Search the Website Glossary of Terms & Definition Podcast on iTunes Other Websites Contact the Foundation